Ang artikulong ito, pahinang pamproyekto, o bahagi nito ay kasalukuyang nasa gitna ng pagpapalawig o malawakang pagbabago. Maaari ka ring tumulong sa pagsasagawa ng mga pagbabago.
Pakisilip ang mga nakaraang pagbabago kung gusto mong makipag-usap sa user na naglagay nito rito. Maaari itong tanggalin kung walang naganap na mga pagbabago sa mga susunod na araw matapos itong ipaskil dito. Maliban kung walang mga pagbabago, hindi dapat ito burahin.
Maligayang pagdating sa kagawaran ng tasahan ng WikiProyekto Anime at manga! Ginawa ang kagawarang ito para tasahin ang kalidad ng mga artikulo na sakop ng WikiProyekto Anime at manga. Sa kasalukuyan, gumagawa pa ng mga kaparaanan para mapabilis ang mga pagtatasa ng mga kalidad , ginagamit din ang paglalagay ng mga klasipikasyon sa mga artikulo sa madalian kaparaanan.
Ang kalidad ay ginagawa sa pamamagitan ng pamamahagi ng mga pagkakabuo batay sa parametro sa banner ng proyekto na {{WikiProyekto Anime at manga}} ; ito ang dahilan na kung saan nabibigyan ng mga dalawahang kaurian batay sa kalidad, na kung saan ito ang pundasyon ng awtomatikong sistema ng paggwa.
Sukat ng Tasahin
Mga artikulong Anime at manga batay sa kalidad at kahalagahan
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
The article is well-organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject, like military history, or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.
Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
Dapat sinasakop ng artikulo ang puno ng paksa, at hindi dapat maglaman ng ibang hindi kabilang sa artikulo o may mga maling impormasyon. Dapat naglalaman ito ng malakihang proporsyon ng bagay na kinakailangan para sa isang artikulong may A na antas, kahit na kinakailangang palawigin ang ilang seksiyon, at may nawawalang impormasyon na hindi na medyo kailangan.
Dapat mayroong eksaktong estruktura ang isang artikulo. Dapat nakaayos ang nilalanam sa pangkat ng mahahalagang bagay, kasama na rito ang pangunahing seksiyon at lahat ng mga seksiyon na dapat isama sa isang artikulo..
Dapat maayos na naisulat ang isang artikulo. Hindi dapat maglaman ng kamalian sa gramatika ang isang artikulo at nasa maayos na takbo, subalit hindi naman kinakailangan ang isang "katumpakan". Hindi kinakailangang sundin parati ang Manwal ng Istilo.
Dapat maglaman ng sumusuportang bagay ang isang artikulo na kung saan nababagay. Ikinakatuwa ang paglalagay ng mga ilustrasyon, kahit na hindi ito gaanong kinakailangan. Dapat may mga diyagramo at infobox dahil ito ay nagagamit sa nilalaman ng artikulo.
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.
The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.
An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.
Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation.
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition.
Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.
Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.
There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.
Sumasaklaw ang mga palatuntunan sa pangkalahatang nilalaman ng mga artikulo. Nagbibigay ang manwal ng istilo ng mga karagdagang palatuntunan tungkol sa dapat lamanin at ayos ng bawat artikulo.
Mayroong tasahan ang bawat artikulo na may kinalaman sa anime at manga sa suleras na {{WikiProject Anime and manga}} na makikita sa usapan ng bawat artikulo, tulad ng {{WikiProject Anime and manga|class=B}}. Magbibigay ito ng awtomatikong kategorya sa loob ng Kategorya:Mga artikulong anime at manga batay sa kalidad. Tandaan na tinutumbok ang klaseng parametro batay sa kaso; tignan ang dokyumentasyon ng suleras para sa karagdagang impormasyon.
Palatuntunang para sa Klaseng B
May ispesyal na kaliwanagan ang ibinibigay sa anim na palatuntunan na kung saan dapat makasunod ang artikulong may B na antas:
Dapat sinasakop ng artikulo ang puno ng paksa, at hindi dapat maglaman ng ibang hindi kabilang sa artikulo o may mga maling impormasyon. Dapat naglalaman ito ng malakihang proporsyon ng bagay na kinakailangan para sa isang artikulong may A na antas, kahit na kinakailangang palawigin ang ilang seksiyon, at may nawawalang impormasyon na hindi na medyo kailangan.
Dapat mayroong eksaktong estruktura ang isang artikulo. Dapat nakaayos ang nilalanam sa pangkat ng mahahalagang bagay, kasama na rito ang pangunahing seksiyon at lahat ng mga seksiyon na dapat isama sa isang artikulo..
Dapat maayos na naisulat ang isang artikulo. Hindi dapat maglaman ng kamalian sa gramatika ang isang artikulo at nasa maayos na takbo, subalit hindi naman kinakailangan ang isang "katumpakan". Hindi kinakailangang sundin parati ang Manwal ng Istilo.
Dapat maglaman ng sumusuportang bagay ang isang artikulo na kung saan nababagay. Ikinakatuwa ang paglalagay ng mga ilustrasyon, kahit na hindi ito gaanong kinakailangan. Dapat may mga diyagramo at infobox dahil ito ay nagagamit sa nilalaman ng artikulo.
Dapat isaalang alang na ang Prayoridad ay isang kaugnay na termino. If importance values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project and to the work groups the article falls under. An article judged to be "Top-importance" in one context may be only "Mid-importance" in another project. The criteria used for rating article priority are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Articles rated as "low-importance" importance are not nessasarily unwanted, but may be candidates for merging into more relevant when appropriate.
All lists, video games and any other notable article that falls within the WikiProject's scope, including most websites, not described in the table below is of low-importance.
Type
Top
High
Mid
Definition
This article is of the utmost importance as it forms the basis of all information.
This article is fairly important as it covers a general area of knowledge.
This article is relatively important as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Series (Main article)
N/A
Lasting impact decades after it was initially released e.g. Gundam.
Achieved wide commercial success or critically acclaimed outside of Japan e.g. Sailor Moon.
Characters
N/A
Characters that have become cultural icons outside of the series e.g. Char Aznable.
Individuals with a career of highly influential works, or historically significant accomplishments (e.g. Ryoichi Ikegami, Leiji Matsumoto)
Individuals with a career of internationally successful or critically acclaimed works (e.g. Ken Akamatsu, Rumiko Takahashi)
Companies, organisations, websites
Highly influential companies, particularly the major Japanese companies involved in manga and/or anime production, e.g. Bones, Sunrise, Shueisha, Shogakukan.
Top licensors and distributors of manga/anime in English language countries, e.g. Viz Media, Tokyopop, A.D. Vision
